Explore. Connect. Excel.
Why You Cannot Use Wikipedia as an Academic Source
Ever since Wikipedia debuted on the Internet, it has proved to be a wealth of information for anyone who is searching for answers. After all, navigating Wikipedia is simple, the information it contains is interesting and mostly accurate, and the internal links offer a seemingly endless source of other topics. In addition, Wikipedia:
- Is a good starting point for a research project
- It provides an overview of a main topic and supporting details
- Its articles have references and citations to conduct further research
- It can teach information collaboration
At the end of the day, however, Wikipedia is not suitable for academic work. For one, you should never use an encyclopedia as a source. Academic work requires primary or, at worst, secondary sources. Encyclopedias are considered a tertiary source.
Even back in 2006, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales told students not to cite Wikipedia for class projects or serious research.
So, why should you not use Wikipedia:
- Wikipedia is not considered scholarly
- Wikipedia acknowledges that its information is not properly vetted
- The site has included hoaxes
- People have created and edited pages to drive traffic to other websites
- Anyone can edit or vandalize the site
You can use Wikipedia for entertainment, to read interesting and informative articles, or as a place to start your research. However, please do not use Wikipedia as a source on your academic papers and projects.